Conformance witness · observation, not accusation · recomputable

Tool-surface change observed — bim.house

Endpoint: https://bim.house/mcp

Version string served, unchanged across both observations: 1.0.0

Change first observed: 2026-10-27T07:40:08.907Z

Finding: CLASS_SUSPENDED

Surface expanded without a version change — clients pinned to this version approved a smaller set of tools than is now served.

What we observed

Two anonymous tools/list enumerations of the endpoint above, at different times.

The serverInfo.version string was byte-identical in both. The tool set was not.

Tools present in the later enumeration but not the earlier (4):

Tools present in the earlier enumeration but not the later (15):

Why this may matter to your users

A client that pinned 1.0.0 and reviewed the tool list at

pin time is, today, being served a different list under the same version string. Gateways

and MCP hosts that cache an approved tool set per version will not re-request approval,

because from their side nothing announced a change.

Verify this yourself

This is a plain MCP handshake. No credentials, nothing of ours required:

curl -s -X POST 'https://bim.house/mcp' \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -H 'Accept: application/json, text/event-stream' \
  -H 'MCP-Protocol-Version: 2025-06-18' \
  -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"initialize","params":{"protocolVersion":"2025-06-18","capabilities":{},"clientInfo":{"name":"check","version":"1"}}}'
# then, with the returned Mcp-Session-Id:
curl -s -X POST 'https://bim.house/mcp' \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -H 'Accept: application/json, text/event-stream' \
  -H 'MCP-Protocol-Version: 2025-06-18' -H 'Mcp-Session-Id: <id>' \
  -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":2,"method":"tools/list","params":{}}'

Our surface hashes over the sorted tool names plus sorted input-schema property names:

observationsurface hash
earliera0bfdeb7310395a11949e5b5c79a7aeffdab38c3aa321b622177f4d76c99ffd5
laterbdcd998ec6360d6da74343f6c3b12ea65549e39a6413106a212231a8c17c0251

If your own enumeration disagrees with the later hash, we are wrong and we want to hear it.

What this report does NOT say

deploy produces exactly this signal, and that is the most likely explanation.

under an unchanged version string.

Absence from our view is not absence from your server.

Method

Unannounced periodic re-enumeration of a live MCP population — we ask the endpoint

directly on a schedule rather than waiting to be notified. Relevant because only

6.4% of live MCP servers have a working channel to announce a change at all

(69.1% never declare tools.listChanged; of those that do, most expose no

server-initiated stream to send it on). A change like the one above cannot reach a

notification-based monitor, which is why it is normally invisible.


*StillOS Digital Holdings — continuous conformance witness for MCP servers.*

*Report generated 2026-10-30T17:18:50.663Z from observations dated 2026-10-27T07:40:08.907Z.*

Is this your server?

If anything here is wrong — a change you did not make, a hash that does not match, a host that was reassigned to you — tell us and we will correct or remove this page. No proof required to request removal; the record is whatever we observed, and your word about your own host outranks it.

Free. Goes to a human. Or email stillmarcus24@gmail.com.